Support Doc -Firearms laws of michigan with links

FIREARMS LAWS OF MICHIGAN

Subsequently, in Hanselman v Wayne County Weapon Bd 0LFK 1: G WKH 6XSUHPH &RXUW GHFODUHG Each concealed weapon licensing board must determine “proper reason” and “suitability” based upon consider DWLRQ RI ORFDO QHHGV DQG DQ H[HUFLVH RI LWV GLVFUHWLRQ $V WKH &RXUW RI $SSHDOV UHFRJQL]HG LQ Bay County Concealed Weapons Licensing Board v Gasta 0LFK $SS 1: G WKH /HJLVODWXUH LQWHQGV the concealed weapon licensing boards to apply local and discretionary standards in deciding whether to grant an DSSOLFDQW D FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQ OLFHQVH ³7KH OLFHQVLQJ ERDUG LV FRPSULVHG RI RQH UHSUHVHQWDWLYH HDFK IURP WKH &RXQW\ 3URVHFXWRU¶V 2I¿FH WKH 6WDWH 3ROLFH DQG WKH &RXQW\ 6KHULII¶V 'HSDUWPHQW %\ FUHDWLQJ D ERDUG FRPSRVHG RI ODZ HQIRUFHPHQW RI¿FLDOV DQG JLYLQJ LW WKH H[FOXVLYH DXWKRULW\ WR LVVXH GHQ\ DQG UHYRNH SHUPLWV IRU FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQV WKH /HJLVODWXUH KDV LQVXUHG WKDW DQ LQGLYLGXDO¶V SHUFHLYHG QHHG WR FDUU\ D FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQ ZLOO EH HYDOXDWHG LQ OLJKW RI WKH H[SHULHQFH DQG NQRZOHGJH RI FRPPXQLW\ QHHGV SRVVHVVHG E\ WKHVH ORFDO RI¿FLDOV 7KH SRWHQWLDO GDQJHU ZKLFK D FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQ SRVHV WR WKH XQVXVSHFWLQJ SXEOLF MXVWL¿HV WKDW OLFHQVLQJ SURFHGXUHV EH HQWUXVWHG WR D ERDUG FRPSULVHG RI ODZ HQIRUFHPHQW RI¿FLDOV “In view of the inherent potential danger which accompanies the issuance of a permit to carry a concealed weapon, WKH OLFHQVLQJ ERDUG DV FRPSRVHG UHÀHFWV WKH /HJLVODWXUH¶V LQWHQW WKDW SRZHU WR LVVXH DQG UHYRNH VXFK >FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQ@ OLFHQVHV LV SURSHUO\ SODFHG ZLWK WKRVH SURIHVVLRQDOV PRVW DEOH WR DVVHVV FRPPXQLW\ QHHGV DQG SUREOHPV in this area.” [Emphasis added.] There are many rules for interpreting statutes. The ultimate goal of all such rules is to ascertain and implement the legislative LQWHQW HYHQ LI WKH LQWHQW PLJKW DSSHDU LQ FRQÀLFW ZLWK WKH OLWHUDO ODQJXDJH RI WKH VWDWXWH People v Stoudemire 0LFK 1: G $OVR VWDWXWHV PXVW EH LQWHUSUHWHG WR DYRLG DEVXUG FRQVHTXHQFHV Webster v Rotary Electric Steel Co , 0LFK 1: G +HUH WKH /HJLVODWXUH KDV FUHDWHG ORFDO JXQ ERDUGV ZLWK WKH H[FOXVLYH DXWKRULW\ WR LVVXH FRQFHDOHG SLVWRO OLFHQVHV 7KH /HJLV ODWXUH KDV LPSRVHG VSHFL¿F VWDWXWRU\ UHTXLUHPHQWV DSSOLFDQWV PXVW PHHW WR REWDLQ WKHVH OLFHQVHV ,Q DGGLWLRQ ZKHWKHU DSSOLFDQWV have good reasons and are suitable persons to be licensed is within the sound discretion of a board of local professionals who apply their knowledge of community needs and problems in evaluating applications. It is inconceivable that the Legislature, after crafting these statutory requirements for obtaining a concealed pistol license, intended to permit Michigan residents to avoid them by obtaining a concealed pistol license in another state that may not impose many of the Michigan requirements. That construction of the statute would result in the absurd consequence that a Michigan resident could avoid the legislatively imposed requirements for obtaining a concealed pistol license in Michigan by obtaining that type of license in another state without having to meet the Michigan requirements. Thus, it must be concluded that a Michigan resident with a concealed pistol OLFHQVH REWDLQHG LQ DQRWKHU VWDWH PD\ QRW FDUU\ D FRQFHDOHG SLVWRO LQ 0LFKLJDQ XQOHVV WKH UHVLGHQW ¿UVW REWDLQV D FRQFHDOHG SLVWRO license in Michigan by meeting the requirements for obtaining the license imposed by Michigan law. It is my opinion, therefore, that a Michigan resident may not carry a concealed pistol in Michigan if the resident has only acquired a license to carry a concealed pistol from another state. Frank J. Kelley Attorney General

Page 202