Support Doc -Firearms laws of michigan with links

FIREARMS LAWS OF MICHIGAN

:KLOH WKH ZLVGRP RI D SXEOLF SROLF\ SHUPLWWLQJ SHDFH RI¿FHUV WR DFTXLUH DXWRPDWLF ZHDSRQV LV RSHQ WR GRXEW , DP FRQ VWUDLQHG WR FRQFOXGH WKDW WKH /HJLVODWXUH KDV SHUPLWWHG UHJXODUO\ HPSOR\HG DQG SDLG SHDFH RI¿FHUV WR DFTXLUH DQG SRVVHVV automatic weapons without a license. However, there is nothing in 1931 PA 328, Ch XXXVII, Sec. 231, supra , which would prevent or limit the director of the Department of State Police, county sheriffs, local chiefs of police, or other police supervisory councils from placing restrictions upon the acquisition and possession of such weapons. In Eaton County Deputy Sheriffs Associations v Eaton County Sheriff , 37 Mich App 427; 195 NW2d 12 (1971), the court held that a sheriff has the authority to prohibit his deputies from carrying WKHLU RZQ VHUYLFH UHYROYHUV ZKLOH RII GXW\ QRWZLWKVWDQGLQJ WKH VWDWXWRU\ H[HPSWLRQ IRU SHDFH RI¿FHUV FRQWDLQHG LQ 3$ Ch XXXVII, Sec. 231, supra. ,Q LWV RSLQLRQ WKH FRXUW QRWHG µ:H ¿QG WKDW WKH H[HPSWLRQ RI SHDFH RI¿FHUV IURP REWDLQLQJ OLFHQVHV WR FDUU\ FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQV LQ QR ZD\ OLPLWV WKH SRZHU LQKHUHQW LQ WKH RI¿FH RI VKHULII WR SURPXOJDWH UXOHV DQG UHJXODWLRQV SHUWDLQLQJ WR WKH HPSOR\PHQW RI deputies. MCLA Sec. 750.231 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp Sec. 28.428) merely provides that Secs. 224 and 227 do QRW DSSO\ WR SHDFH RI¿FHUV 7KHUHIRUH WKH RI¿FHUV PD\ FDUU\ FRQFHDOHG ZHDSRQV ZLWKRXW EHLQJ JXLOW\ RI D IHORQ\ ‘However, in our opinion, MCLA Sec. 750.231 in no way limits the power of the sheriff to make rules and regu lations which, in his opinion, improve the quality of law enforcement and increase the safety of the citizens in the community. We therefore hold that the trial court was correct in dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.’ It also should be observed that 1935 PA 59, Sec. 9; MCLA 28.9; MSA 4.439, vests the director of the Department of State Police with authority to adopt rules and regulations for the control, discipline and conduct of members of the department; 1895 3$ &K 9,, 6HF 0&/$ 06$ DXWKRUL]HV WKH YLOODJH FRXQFLO WR PDNH DOO QHFHVVDU\ UXOHV IRU WKH JRYHUQPHQW RI WKH YLOODJH SROLFH GHSDUWPHQW DQG 3$ 6HF 0&/$ 06$ HPSRZHUV WKH WRZQVKLS ERDUG RI DQ\ WRZQVKLS WR HVWDEOLVK UXOHV DQG UHJXODWLRQV IRU WKH RSHUDWLRQ RI WKH WRZQVKLS SROLFH GHSDUWPHQW DQG LWV RI¿FHUV GHWHFWLYHV and employees. As to cities, the Michigan Supreme Court has held that members of a city police department subject themselves to reasonable rules and regulations adopted by the board of control of the department. Aller v Detroit Police Department Trial Board 0LFK 1: G ,W LV P\ RSLQLRQ WKHUHIRUH WKDW SHDFH RI¿FHUV LQ 0LFKLJDQ PD\ SRVVHVV ZLWKRXW D OLFHQVH PDFKLQH JXQV RU RWKHU DXWRPDWLF ZHDSRQV VXEMHFW WR UHVWULFWLRQV SODFHG XSRQ VXFK DFTXLVLWLRQ RU SRVVHVVLRQ E\ WKHLU VXSHUYLVRU\ ERDUG RU RI¿FLDO DV WKH FDVH may be. Frank J. Kelley Attorney General

Page 200